Do You Dare?
I know. God balances the whole universe with His own unique way.
I know. He created black and white, as well as man and woman. Positive and negative. {Macs & PCs 
}. Even particle, has anti-particle.
I know, if we go Newtonian, using the same weight in both sides would result in a balanced equation.
Null.
Does that mean every balancing effort should/would result in a zero equation to satisfy the law? How can we apply the law to our life? Or even before we asked ourself such question, does the law itself applicable to life? If it does, then what is life? I always believed that life is not only a bunch of cells interconnected by neurons with physics, life is way more complicated and more valuable than just mere definitions.
Happiness and Sadness.
If the Newtonian is applicable to life, I don’t think life would even exist. To my believe, life is balanced. Well, at least that’s how I see life. One simple argument is that happiness and sadness would never be balanced using this equation, no matter how we weighted the variable. The fact is, happiness does exist as a counterpart of sadness, and the balance of life is not created by opposing those values face to face. My point is, I don’t think a balanced life could be reached by using Newtonian on happiness and sadness. A balanced life is not created by subtracting happiness by sadness. Because if that so, then life would be meaningless from the start.
Happiness and sadness will always be there, where it belongs. No matter how you chase happiness, sadness will eventually come too. So, what’s more important is how we manage to perceive both in creating a balanced life.
…
…
…
Do you dare, losing away all your happy feeling but losing your sad feeling at the same time?
*I stop. I’m losing my mood. Yet, I still have so many things in my mind, running here and there, unwritten*
**I’m sorry, I wrote this at work, a don’t-try-this-at-work material**
Peace. Out.
Seriously, dude, I don’t understand a thing you said. Hehe
@ bluekurv: Yeah, neither do I.. :p